|
|
The
Road to Successful Adulthood: FMHI Lays a Pathway
for Youth and Young
Adults with Serious Mental Illness
“He’ll grow out of it,” “it’s just a phase” and “this
too shall pass” are words of encouragement most parents will hear from
time to time as they struggle to make it through their children’s adolescent
years. For many parents, those words hold true, but for the 3 million transition-age
youth in America today who are struggling with Serious Emotional Disturbance
or Severe Mental Illness (SED/SMI) - the only thing they may grow out of
is the developmentally appropriate and relevant services they received from
child-serving
organizations such as schools, foster care, mental health, detention and
corrections. Once 18, and without appropriate services to successfully transition
to independent
adulthood, these youth are faced with many risks and challenges that hinder
successful
outcomes.
“Young adults with SED/SMI have the poorest outcomes of all people with
disabilities as they enter adulthood,” said Jan Richter,
Advocacy Director of Connect for Kids, an organization dedicated to ensuring
that young people
have the supports, opportunities and services needed to prosper and contribute
where they live, learn, work, play and make a difference.
"
They also have serious gaps,” added Richter, “especially in
developmentally appropriate services, including mental health services,
once they reach age 18. It doesn’t have to be this way.”
Richter recently moderated a conference call among leaders in the field
of mental health who focus on improving outcomes for youth and young adults
with SED/SMI
and their families.
Principles Behind
Developmentally-Appropriate Services for Youth and Young Adults
with SED/SMI
1. Engage young people through relationship development, person-centered
planning, and a focus on their future.
2. Tailor services and supports to be accessible, coordinated, developmentally
appropriate.
3. Acknowledge and develop personal choice and social responsibility with
young people.
4. Ensure that a safety net of support is provided by a young person’s
team, parents (when appropriate) and other natural supports.
5. Enhance young persons’ competencies to assist them in achieving
greater self-sufficiency and confidence.
6. Maintain an outcome focus in the Transition to Independence Process
(TIP) system at the young person, program, and system levels.
7. Involve young people, parents and other natural and community partners
in the TIP system at the practice, program and system levels. |
Dr. Hewitt (Rusty) Clark, director
of the National Center
on Youth Transition (NCYT) at CFS/FMHI, the
only national technical assistance
center that
is exclusively focused on improving transition practices, systems and
outcomes for this population,
was among the leaders asked to participate.
Additional participants included representatives from the Partnerships
for Youth Transition (PYT) Initiative, funded from 2002-2006 by the Substance
Abuse and
Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) to develop and implement
transition programs for youth with SED/SMI age 14 to 25. During the funding
cycle, Clark
and the NCYT team assisted the five demonstration sites in their planning,
development, implementation, and refinement of transition systems for
youth and young adults.
Clark, along with Nicole Deschenes, Co-Director of the NCYT, DeDe Sieler,
head of the Washington State site, and Melanie Green, Consumer Support
Specialist for the Clark County Regional Support Network in Washington
State, gave an
idea
of the breakthrough work done at the PYT sites and the driving principles
behind developmentally-appropriate services that the PYT demonstration
projects, and
others, have relied on to improve services and to align programs, community
systems, partners and policies to support young people’s developmental
transition to adulthood (see guidelines at side bar).
“
The SAMHSA grant provided funding in a way that allowed the process of
engaging young people to be much more flexible,” said De De Sieler. “When
staff are allowed to engage with young people at their own pace, the
relationship between staff and youth is much stronger.”
“By framing goals in ways that are about the young person’s future,
the work automatically focuses on the positive, something hopeful,
which yields more active engagement,” added Rusty Clark. “Also, this
future’s
focus encourages an emphasis on youth strengths rather than deficits."
Melanie Green added that the location and setting of the program
is very important. She discussed the importance of having conversations
in a relaxed,
age appropriate,
appealing environment where youth want to be. “We learned from
youth involved in planning that they didn’t want to go to the community
mental health center because they wanted a more stigma-free setting.
We have
conveniently
located a building in our community, a youth house open to a number of
programs for youth
and young adults. With programs based here, conversations can happen
over a pool table or checker game, and you actually get more work done
because
youth
love
the environment.”
“We recognize that these individuals are at a developmental level where
they want to call the shots, to make decisions,” said Dr. Clark. “We
must create opportunities for youth to make decisions, try out problem
solving, start learning to evaluate the impact of their choices/actions
on themselves
and others. It's a tough balance – between maximizing success
through helping them by your teaching, cajoling, support, and counseling,
but
also letting
them encounter natural life experiences for themselves, just like their
peers. This
is a time to try things out, a period of recovery, but it is even more
a period of discovery.”
“ The key is natural settings and teachable moments,” said
Melanie Green. “When you’re out with youth in community settings,
something comes up, so you teach.”
Melanie provided a great example.
“ We had a young lady in a steering committee meeting. We were talking
about sustainability after our grant money was going to end. This young woman
was very upset about the possibility that the program would go away. She expressed
herself
in a way that, in a lot of situations, she probably would have been asked
to leave and come back after she was able to calm down. But we allowed her
to
speak when she was upset, recognizing how great it was that she was trying
to
advocate
for herself and her peers. She was recognized for her assertive skills
rather than being emotionally unregulated. We have subsequently worked with
her in learning even more effective assertive and self advocacy skills. Eventually,
this young
woman was honored by her community for her advocacy work. This was a
successful
example of teaching in the moment through everyday interactions.”
In its analysis on the effectiveness of the PYT approaches, NCYT found
that young people with SED/SMI who completed at least one year of the
PYT programs showed
positive movement in education and employment, and a reduction in interference
in their lives from their mental health and drug or alcohol abuse.
Clark suggested that states and the federal government need to do more
in deliberate efforts to address the transition support of the youth
and young adults they
serve, including:
1. Extend continuity of care to the ages of 25 or 30. Eliminate arbitrary
age-related barriers to the continuation of services by adjusting
official definitions of
SED/SMI.
2. Encourage states to extend Medicaid coverage beyond age 18. Continuity
of care also becomes an issue when Medicaid cuts mental health services
to young
adults as soon as they turn 18. All of sudden, the participant must find
another mental health provider, or worse—the participant is left
without a mental health provider.
3. Take the lead in acknowledging the age-specific needs of young adults.
More transition support services are needed so participants can tailor
appropriate
treatment plans that address their critical health and living needs.
The services offered by the PYT sites have helped transition-age youth
attend
college, secure
first apartments, and foster mental well being.
4. Fund more formal research on best practices in serving transition-age
young adults with SED/SMI.
5. Require states to: a) report the number of 16-21 and 22-30 year-olds
served through federal block grant funding; b) describe the services
specific for these
age groups, and c) describe plans for services improvement.
“ We must better assist these young people with making a successful
transition into adulthood, with all of them achieving, within their potential,
their personal
goals related to employment, education, living situation, personal
effectiveness, and community life functioning,” said Dr. Clark. “Helping
them to become productive resilient adults is a win-win situation for all involved.”
For additional information about the work of the center, contact
Hewitt B. “Rusty” Clark or Nicole
Deschenes regarding national initiatives at clark@fmhi.usf.edu,
or deschenes@fmhi.usf.edu.
|
|